bite my words

Dispelling nutrition myths, ranting, and occasionally, raving


Leave a comment

What I hate about New Year’s resolutions

I know that as a dietitian you would think that I would be all gung-ho about people making New Years resolutions to eat healthier/lose weight/exercise more. Then again, if you know me, or read my blog, you probably won’t be all that surprised to learn that I am not a huge fan of these sorts of resolutions.

I keep overhearing people talking about their resolutions to “go on a diet”, to “lose ten pounds”, to “go to the gym”. They kind of make me want to tear out my hair. It’s all I can do to keep my mouth shut by biting my tongue. I’m all for people becoming healthier. I wouldn’t have studied nutrition if I wasn’t. I’m also a huge fan of exercise and active transportation. And I practice what I preach. However, I view these types of resolutions as pretty much guaranteed to fail.

There is absolutely no point in resolving to do something that you hate. If you don’t like going to the gym or running or whatever exercise you’re resolving to do, you’re not going to stick with it. Pick something that you will actually get some enjoyment out of. Try different things. Sometimes it’s going to be a battle but it shouldn’t feel like torture to lace up your sneakers.

Diets are the dreaded “D” word. I wish I could remove that word from our vernacular. Dieting has become synonymous with deprivation. I also don’t think that anyone views a diet as a permanent change. Sure, you can lose weight through depriving yourself of calories or food groups but odds are you’re not going to be able to continue to do so for the rest of your life. As I’ve said again and again: if you want to see sustainable weight loss, you’ve got to make sustainable changes.

These resolutions are also fairly vague. If you do want to improve your health try to focus on reasonable goals that you might actually stick with. One year I resolved to do yoga at least once a week because I felt I needed to improve my flexibility. And yes, I did stick with it; not because I love yoga (I don’t) but because I’m stubborn and sometimes it’s for my own good. Suggested realistic resolutions: aim to cook at least X number of meals at home a week, bring a lunch to work at least 4 days a week, only buy coffee out once a week, switch to drinking your coffee black, aim to add an extra serving of vegetables or fruit every day, try a new (to you) fruit/vegetable/grain/other whole food every time you go grocery shopping. Resolutions should be about making your life better.


1 Comment

Support for sick days

I realise that I keep getting a little off-topic lately, ranting about non-nutrition issues. At least I’ve been sticking with health issues. And hey, it’s my blog, I can rant about whatever I please, right?

In my temp job we all received this Report from CFIB on public sector sick days. The news release states that public sector employees in Canada take nearly 5 more sick days per year than employees working in the private sector, costing up to $3.5 billion. The non-so-subtle implication that public sector employees are taking sick days when they’re not really sick really pissed me off. I think that there are likely a number of reasons why public sector employees take more sick days than private sector employees and, for the most part, I don’t think they have anything to do with taking “undeserved” sick days.

When I worked in private sector jobs they usually didn’t provide health benefits, they also usually didn’t pay very well. When I was sick I would drag my aching body to work and suffer through the day because I couldn’t afford to lose a days pay. Those were probably the worst jobs for me to be going to while sick as I was usually working in customer service so I was spreading my germs to a much larger number of people than I would have in an office job.

I see so many people come into work when they shouldn’t. In most cases, the world will not cease to exist if you take a day off work. I wouldn’t be surprised if productivity actually improved when people took a day off to get better rather than struggling through a number of days while feeling sub-par. I would actually argue that public sector employees should be praised for having the good sense (and the compensation to allow them) to take sick days when they’re sick. Sick days exist for a purpose. More people should take time off to rest and get healthy, and contain their germs, when they’re sick.


Leave a comment

Chicken vs chick’n

Something I’ve been asked about, and have been curious about myself, is how vegan meat substitutes stack up nutrition-wise to the original meat products. I decided to do a little comparison of chicken strips (not breaded, but seasoned) to see. Of course, neither product provided nutrition information based on a food guide serving. Upon first glance, the vegan version appears to be far healthier. However, the nutrition facts panel is based on a 67 gram serving, while the actual meat product uses a 100 gram serving size. If you were wondering, Canada’s Food Guide counts 75 grams of meat, fish, poultry as a serving. Just to keep things simple, and because most people eat a larger portion than the food guide recommends, I converted the vegan chick’n strips into a 100 gram serving. This puts them at roughly 149 calories per serving. The actual chicken is 110 kcal. Score: chicken 1, chick’n 0. The chick’n has 2.24 grams of fat (none of which is saturated or trans). The chicken has 1 gram of fat, 0.3 of which is saturated. I’m calling this a tie, they’re both relatively low in fat. Score remains: chicken 1, chick’n 0. Chick’n has no cholesterol. Chicken has 70 mg of cholesterol. Dietary cholesterol doesn’t have all that much impact on your blood cholesterol, especially if you’re healthy. I’ll still give this one to the chick’n. Score: chicken 1, chick’n 1. The chick’n has 254 mg of sodium per serving. The chicken has 380 mg of sodium. Another one for the chick’n. Score: chicken: 1, chick’n 2. The chick’n has 28 grams of protein per serving. The chicken has 26 grams of protein per serving. Not a huge difference. However, it’s important to note the quality of protein. Does the protein provide you with all of the essential amino acids? I know that the chicken does. The chick’n I’m not so sure about. Because of this, I’m calling this one another draw. Score remains the same. The chick’n provides you with 15% of your daily recommended intake of iron (if you’re the “average” person on which the label is based) while chicken provides you with only 8%. However, as this iron is non-heme iron, it’s not going to be as easily absorbed as the iron in the chicken. Final score: chick’n 2, chicken 1.

Even though the chick’n is the nutritional winner here it was a close competition and I am in no way trying to convince you to start eating chick’n or any other vegan meat substitute. I just think it’s good for us to know if the foods we’re eating are providing us with the nutrients we believe them to be. On the basis of the nutrition label for these two particular products, chick’n is a worthy alternative for chicken. Please bear in mind that there are other nutrients that are not listed on the nutrition label that you may obtain from one product but not from the other. Also, other vegan meat substitutes might differ considerably in their nutrient profile so please read your labels!


Leave a comment

Follow Friday: PLoS Blogs

Interested in being on the cutting edge of science and research? You might want to check out PLoS blogs. PLoS stands for the Public Library of Science. Their blog network brings a diverse group of science and medicine bloggers together in one place and everything published on the site is is done under the Creative Commons Open Access Licence, so you can spread the knowledge to others. Blogs on the Network that you might especially enjoy are: Obesity Panacea and Speaking of Medicine.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 564 other followers