A recent article in Natural News reported that a number of Celestial Seasonings brand teas “contained potentially dangerous levels of multiple pesticides”. This article was based on a report released by Glaucus Research back in February of this year. It’s important to note that Glaucus Research is “highly critical of Hain Celestial. Though Glaucus Research is an investment firm that specializes in short selling and one which stands to gain financially if Hain Celestial stocks go down”.
In response to the initial report by Glaucus, Celestial Seasonings issued a statement of Safety Assurance. Telling consumers that they had promptly had their teas tested for pesticide residues by an independent lab and had found that pesticide levels of all teas tested were within acceptable amounts.
So, who to believe? The company that stands to profit from plummeting sales of Celestial Seasonings teas? Or Celestial Seasonings which stands to lose from plummeting sales. It’s a pity that we can’t do our own pesticide residue testing at home, as I’m not inclined to have faith in either party here.
What’s a tea drinker to do? The article in Natural News suggests that Rankabrand.org rates Twinnings Tea as an A (Celestial Seasonings received a D). However, Twinnings actually has a C on the rank a brand site. Regardless, the brand ranking is based on sustainability, not food safety, making it somewhat irrelevant to the discussion. Not that I’m saying sustainability is unimportant (of course, it’s highly important) I’m just saying that if you’re worried about pesticides in your tea, that site isn’t going to be of any assistance.
I found this 2010-2011 report on pesticides in coffee, juice, and tea by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency that doesn’t state specific brands tested but does tell us that 75% of teas sampled were compliant with regulations and: “Oolong tea contained the highest percentage of samples with pesticide residue violations at 75% followed by white tea at 50%, green tea at 32%, herbal and black tea at 20% each, and other tea at 12%. Detectable pesticide residues were found in all types of tea sampled.” However, the CFIA goes on to state that the level of pesticides found in the teas did not pose any risk to the consumer.
It seems that the risk of pesticide consumption has less to do with the brand than with the variety of tea. I think that you’re likely to consume at least some quantity of pesticide when you’re drinking a cup of tea and you just have to decide if that risk is worth it to you.