Today I just want to rant a little bit about the patriarchy and research, particularly in relation to mothers and pregnant women. You’ve likely all heard about the difference between men and women when it comes to heart attacks, leading to missed diagnoses in many women, and how most drug trials are done using men so that we have very little evidence regarding the efficacy and side effects of many medications on women across their lifespan.
Then you see results of studies like this one which, despite the cognitive effects of alcohol consumed during breastfeeding no longer being evident when children are 10 years of age, provides the message that breastfeeding women should not consume alcohol. This despite the fact that alcohol is removed from breastmilk at the same rate as it is from the bloodstream. This means that while pumping and dumping is an ineffective measure to prevent infants from consuming alcohol via breastmilk that mothers can still safely consume alcohol and breastfeed provided they allow for adequate time for alcohol to clear from the milk. If you’re a breastfeeding mum, you can use this table to determine how long you’ll need to wait after drinking before you can breastfeed your baby (unfortunately, it might be longer than you would think).
Women who are of childbearing age are often told not to consume alcohol at all. Just on the off chance that they might get knocked up and damage the fetus before they realize that they’re pregnant. Women who are pregnant should definitely never consume any alcohol at all because their baby might end up suffering the effects of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). And yet, many perfectly healthy babies are born to women who consume alcohol during pregnancy, indicating that there is likely a window (or windows) during which a certain amount of alcohol may be consumed without affecting the development of the fetus.
Pregnant women are shamed for drinking coffee, and some have even been refused coffee by baristas (and they say dietitians are the food police!). This despite the fact that pregnant women can safely consume up to 300 mg of caffeine a day (about the amount you’d get from a grande coffee). And the fact that the research on caffeine consumption during pregnancy is mixed.
Pregnant women are not allowed to eat: soft cheese, deli meat, sushi (unless it’s veggie), raw eggs, tuna (and other large fish), organ meat, raw sprouts, paté, unpasteurized juice or cider, store-made salads, and packaged salads, many herbal teas.
Naturally we want to exhibit an abundance of caution when the health of the woman and the fetus/infant are potentially at risk. However, I bet that if men were the ones giving birth that we would know exactly how much of all these things could be safely consumed during pregnancy and breastfeeding and the precise windows during which they needed to be avoided. But because (cis) men don’t give birth or breastfeed but they generally conduct most of the scientific research we are told to err on the side of caution. I mean what do they care if we can’t have a beer for 30 or so years because we might get pregnant at some point during that time, or enjoy some lovely brie because there is a teensy risk that we might get listeriosis and miscarry. As long as we are protecting their offspring that’s all that matters. And if a woman dares to defy all of the dietary restrictions placed on her during pregnancy societal shaming will cause her to toe the line. After all, questioning these restrictions shows that you are an unfit mother and selfishly putting your enjoyment of bruschetta ahead of your own child for whom you should be enthusiastically giving up everything for while your husband is out drinking with his buddies.
Please note: I am not suggesting that women who are pregnant reject all of this dietary advice. There are very real risks to consuming these foods and beverages during pregnancy. I am however suggesting that we reject the unquestioning acceptance of these restrictions because you know that if men were the ones getting pregnant there would already be a body of research into precisely what could be consumed when.
Sep 17, 2018 at 11:55 am
Too true! And while on the subject of rants, when you get to be an old person, male or female but particularly female, you might as well not exist at all when it comes to medical research.
I should note that you seem to have turned out perfectly all right despite being breastfed by a mother who consumed about a bottle of port a fortnight during your early days on this planet. 😲😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sep 17, 2018 at 12:01 pm
Ha! Maybe that explains a lot 😉
It’s unfortunate that the default for human research trials is all too often men 18-45.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sep 17, 2018 at 2:09 pm
Excuse my ignorance but I thought the limited amount of research on this is because of the ethical implications of testing on pregnant/nursing mothers? Like I thought the guidelines were there because they can’t test the upper limits of certain foods/beverages on the target group because of the risk associated with it? So they just give rough estimates because, wouldn’t they get sued if a bunch of women miscarried because they wanted to test how much raw sushi/blue cheese or whatever can be consumed during pregnancy/nursing?
LikeLike
Sep 17, 2018 at 2:59 pm
Ethical implications are absolutely the reason given for the lack of research. However, I feel that if men were the ones having babies that they would be much more inclined to find a way to conduct the research.
LikeLike
Sep 18, 2018 at 4:43 pm
My former gyn actually wrote a book on pregnancy, etc, saying basically “you can have a glass of wine occasionally at this point in the pregnancy” and talking about breastfeeding and boozing. I’m sure they could find a way to do the research if they wanted to…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sep 20, 2018 at 9:35 am
https://www.amazon.com/Whole-Pregnancy-Handbook-Obstetricians-Conventional/dp/1592401112/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1537450511&sr=8-1&keywords=dr+joel+evans
LikeLiked by 1 person